Wisconsin Election Officials Forced to Issue Guidance About How to Deal With Fed Agents at Polls
![]()
Of Course a 2020 Fake Elector Is Involved in This Saga
As key members of the Trump administration refuse to give straight answers about whether they intend to send armed federal agents to polling places in a few weeks β which is against federal law β Wisconsin election officials are grappling with the vacuum that that ambiguity has created.
For more than a year, weβve been covering the wishy-washy responses from Trump administration officials like Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, FBI Director Kash Patel and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to serious questions about the matter. President Trump has remained vague on the issue as well. The reason executive branch officials are facing questions about whether this is something theyβre considering is twofold. The Trump administration has made it clear it has every intention of pulling out all the stops to interfere in statesβ rights to administer their own elections, and Trumpβs election denying allies outside the administration (e.g. Steve Bannon) are agitating around the idea. Trump himself has also expressed profound regret about not enlisting members of the military to seize voting equipment in 2020.
Hegseth has creatively dodged on the matter repeatedly in public, telling the Senate Armed Services Committee back in April that he has βnever been ordered to do anything illegal, and I wonβtβ when questioned about deploying service members to voting sites. Patel and Mullin have been a bit less slimy about it by essentially admitting its something theyβve thought about doing. Patel recently told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he plans to have agents and intelligence analysts stationed at FBI field offices during the election in case there are any election security-related issues that need to be investigated. And Mullin has walked a similar line that leaves the door open for armed officers at polling places in particular (if far-fetched) circumstances.
βThe only reason why we would be at polling places is if there is a threat to that polling place or weβre serving a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down,β he said last month.
Election officials are now being forced to step in and address the potential for disruption should the administration concoct some sort of emergency justification for sending armed federal officers to key precincts. Federal law prevents the government from sending any armed troops, agents or officers to polling place unless it is to βrepel armed enemies of the United States.β
Members of the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission voted on Thursday to sign off on guidance that will be sent to local election officials to help them navigate such a situation. Hereβs what the guidance says, according to the Associated Press:
The memo tells Wisconsinβs roughly 1,800 clerks who administer elections what to do if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, Department of Homeland Security officials, FBI agents or local law enforcement shows up at the polls.
If officers arrive, the guidance says the head of the polling site should inform the municipal clerk, who should then tell the county clerk and the state elections commission. If the agents are there to observe, they must check in like any other observer and be subject to rules governing them, the guidance says.
Only one member of the board, a Republican, reportedly voted against sending out the guidance, in comments that actively diminished the threat and potential for major disenfranchisement in key parts of the country.
βI personally think this guidance is unnecessary because we have not seemed to need it the past 201 years,β Republican CommissionerΒ Bob SpindellΒ said, per the AP.
It may not surprise you to learn that Spindell was one of Trumpβs fake electors in Wisconsin during the 2020 election.