❌

Normal view

Received β€” 31 August 2025 ⏭ The Online Photographer

The Best Zoom Range

31 August 2025 at 18:19

New nikkor zoom

The new Nikkor-Z 24–70mm Ζ’/2.8 II

I noticed that Nikon has (pick one) revamped, refreshed, restored, and renewed its mainstream mid-range zoom for the Z System, the bread-and-butter 24–70mm. The main difference is that the new lens has internal zooming, for the first time ever, according to Nikon, in a lens of this spec. Its length is about mid-way between the lengths of the older lens when extended and not extended. The lens has apparently inspired Nikon to poetry: the automatic focusing is effected by a new tech called "Silky Swift" VCM (voice coil motor). Nikon says the SSVCM AF is the fastest in its history. Which is cool. Although I'm not sure how significant that will be if it's only a tiny bit faster than the old lensβ€”I've used several other alleged fastest-evers over the years and generally it wasn't something I would have noticed if they hadn't told me about it. The idea of it is the most attractive part. You'd have to use both to see if you notice it. The internal focusing and zooming, though, has a real practical effectβ€”it means the lens won't suck in dust, and it enables the lens to be better sealed against moisture. Nikon also says the lens won't change its balance as its settings are changed when used in video rigs and so forth, although I don't know how significant that can be either. The new lens is optimized in several ways for video, because that's the age we're in. It costs $2,800, which for a normal zoom of top quality sounds both crazy and is also probably to be expected. Nikon also says it's the lightest lens in its class at a pound and a half.Β 

Longtime readers might be getting a mite suspicious at my tone, because they remember that I'm not the world's biggest fan of zoom lenses in general. I admit to that. But I've used a lot of them, of course, over many years. And what this makes me think is, yes, the lens does sound like it's really been improved, even over its excellent predecessor, and that's mighty appealing on its face; who doesn't hanker for the best?

But wait. Do you really want a lens of this range in the first place? I had to think about that for a minute.

I've found that, for myself, a zoom lens is more useful if it goes longer. And, I don't need it to be so wide. One of my early zoom lenses for 35mm film, also a Nikkor, was, if memory serves, a 35–105mm. That was a better range for me. When I bought my first DSLR in 2006, it came with a 28–75mm Tamron-built, Minolta-branded zoom that I used as my only lens until the camera brokeβ€”on "cropped sensor," as they called APS-C sized chips at the time, it was a 42–112mm equivalent. And it was an eye-opener for me, because, even with the near-normal short end, the longer long end was really nice to have, and quite useful even for a guy who's never been that much into telephoto shooting. I of course intended to exchange that lens for a "better" one even as I bought the camera, but in fact I never did. It was a nice-looking lens with good performance, and I was satisfied with the range. You can still buy a descendant of that very lens today.Β 

A 70mm focal length on the long end just doesn't do it, IMHO. It makes any zoom lens feel like half a zoom. It's not useful enough for enough things. Yes, you can kinda press it into service as a portrait focal length, replacing an 85mm or 90mm, but even so it's not ideal, and I've usually always had a prime for my short tele because it's an important lens to me.Β 

What would be your ideal focal length range for a zoom lens? Definitely taking into account things like probable cost and weight. All in all, I'd rather have a zoom with a longer focal length on both ends, and then fill in with a prime ultrawide at the wide end. Like, say, a 35–110mm zoom with a 21mm prime in the bag. That would do best for me.

Your zooming may vary.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

Β Β Β Β Β Β 

First Update on the Great Update

31 August 2025 at 16:43

Ed. note: TypePad, TOP's home for 17 years, is going out of business on September 30th and wiping its contents from the Web. I'm scrambling to build a new site and archive the old one before that happens. I'll be keeping regular readers and old friends updated on the process as we go along. Feel free to skip these if you wantβ€”it's just nuts 'n' bolts housekeeping, if that's not mixing metaphors. This is hopefully temporary, just for the month of September. Come back on October 1 and see how we did! β€”MikeΒ 

After failing to export TOP using its own export feature, and failing to make a fully usable backup with either Sitesucker or Sitefetcher, I'm resorting to backing up the entire site manually. TypePad creates a file of all posts for any specific month, as you can see under the header "ARCHIVES" at the bottom of the right-hand sidebar when you look at the full site on a desktop. If I open one of these in Safari, and go to File > Save as...Β  with a destination folder and "Format: Web Archive" set in the dialog box, I can create a copy of that month's archive that will open in Safari even when I'm offline. Unfortunately, although it preserves all Featured Comments, the other comments from the main comments section are missing, as are the larger versions of the pictures and illustrations.Β 

If I do the same thing in Firefox (in Firefox you go to hamburger stack > Save page as... and then set a destination folder and select "Format: Web page complete") it preserves a copy of the archive web page that will open in the Firefox browser offline, but Firefox also preserves a second folder with all the larger JPEGs in it. So that's good. But still, the full comments sections are lost.Β 

I'm pretty happy I've been doing the Featured Comments all these years. Those will be preserved. I sure hate to lose all the other comments, though. There are some very useful things in amongst 'em.

If I go to one single post and save that web page in this way, then all the comments in addition to the Featured Comments are preserved. But while I can save all the monthly compilations with maybe half a day's or a day's work, it's too much work to save all the posts individuallyβ€”there are 9,369 TOP posts on TypePad. Even if I could put in the time, I know myself, and I know I'm not good at repetitive detail work. As I get progressively more bored and distracted my efficiency and effectiveness deteriorate and I start making mistakes. I'm not the person for such a job. (I should have been doing it all along, but, well, I didn't.)

The saved files open, as I've said, when I'm offline, but they open from within the browser they were saved with. I'm not exactly sure why or how that's the case. But it occurs to me that some future change to the browser could make it so that my archived backups won't open any more. I don't know how to guard against that. I'm thinking I should probably save all the monthly archive compilations in both Safari and Firefox, just to hedge against either one of the browsers breaking the old files sometime in the future. I'm also going to pursue the permissions that would allow Sitefetcher to work (there's a list of troubleshooting steps but I don't understand any of it myself. Maybe I can find somebody to help).

So that's where I am on backups.

As far as hiring a developer, I've interviewed three outfits (unclear whether they are individuals or companies with multiple people) on freelancer com. Most of the freelancers there appear to be based in the Indian subcontinent. They typically quote low hourly rates ($15–$25) but then estimate high numbers of hours to build a Wordpress.org blog site (60–80 hours). I'm feeling like the blind man exploring the elephant when it comes to hiring a developerβ€”I don't know the landscape at all. Plus, I keep waffling between Wordpress and Squarespace, which isn't helping. This is not going to be the month to be indecisive, Mike, I say to myself. Probably not the time to try to cheap out, either. Wouldn't you know this would happen right after I bought a new-to-me car for the first time in 11 years...had I known this was coming, I would have held off on the car. Same thing happened to me with the mono camera, as some people might remember. But you know what they say: Oh well.

More updates as we go forward...feel free to skip these if you want! But on the other hand, comments sure are welcome. They let me feel less alone if nothing else. It's not always easy being a one-man band.Β 

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

Ray Giubilo's Fantastic Freaky Capture

31 August 2025 at 15:21

Ray Giubilo is an Australian-Italian sports photographer (born in Adelaide, Australia, moved to Italy when he was seven, moved back to Australia in his mid-20s and opened his first photography studio, in Sydney, in 1987. Here's Ray). Yonex is a maker of tennis racquets. Jasmine Paolini is an Italian tennis star who was a finalist at both the French and Wimbledon last year and is currently ranked world No. 8. All you need to know is that Yonex's symbol is two circles and two triangles, and when Yonex strings Jasmine's racquets they color the strings except for the circle and triangle shapes. And look what happened to Ray....

Freaky.Β 

Following the publication of the shot (taken with a Nikon), according to The Guardian, Jasmine was on the court for a second-round match. Ray thought she was going over to hug her coach at one point, but she came over to him, gave him a high five and a grin and said, "great shot."

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

❌